Flowise vs n8n
A side-by-side comparison of Flowise and n8n, two Orchestration tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Flowise
OrchestrationVisually build AI agents and LLM workflows — drag-and-drop, self-hosted.
View FlowiseAt a glance
| Attribute | Flowise | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Orchestration | Orchestration |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | FlowiseAI | n8n |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Flowise
Drag-and-drop counterpart to code-first frameworks — builds on LangChain/LlamaIndex nodes, self-hosts via npm/Docker.
- Visual, low-code agent builder
- Apache-2.0 core, self-hostable
- Provider-agnostic node ecosystem
- Multi-agent flows on a canvas
- Complex logic outgrows the canvas
- Less control than writing code
- Cloud tier is a separate paid product
n8n
The self-hostable Zapier alternative with first-class AI/LangChain nodes and per-execution (not per-task) pricing.
- Free Community Edition
- 500+ integrations
- Visual builder bridging APIs and databases
- Per-execution pricing, not per-task
- Code nodes for full control
- Fair-code license, not OSI open-source
- Self-host carries ops overhead
- Steeper than Zapier for non-technical users
When to pick which
Both cover Tool / function calling and RAG pipeline.
Pick Flowise if you need Multi-agent orchestration, LLM observability, and AI app builder.
- Multi-agent orchestration (primary capability)
- LLM observability (secondary capability)
- AI app builder (primary capability)
Pick n8n if you need Workflow orchestration and Agent framework.
- Workflow orchestration (primary capability)
- Agent framework (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary