Skip to content

Filevine vs Harvey

A side-by-side comparison of Filevine and Harvey, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Filevine

Legal

Legal case-management platform with firm-wide AI agents that do the work.

View Filevine

Harvey

Legal

Domain-specific AI for legal and professional services.

View Harvey

At a glance

Feature comparison of Filevine and Harvey
AttributeFilevineHarvey
CategoryLegalLegal
PricingPAIDPAID
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
DeploymentCloudCloud
PlatformsWebWeb
Model supportMulti-modelMulti-model
Vendor (differs)FilevineHarvey AI

The honest brief

Filevine

Firm-wide AI agents that execute legal work end-to-end inside a full case-management system, not just a standalone research or drafting chatbot.

  • Agents execute work, not just summarize
  • Built on a large legal-matter graph
  • Full case and practice management
  • Source traceability on outputs
  • Used by large firms and enterprises
  • No public pricing (demo only)
  • Geared to firms and legal ops
  • AI outcome claims vendor-reported

Harvey

The default general-purpose legal AI at scale: Vault analyzes up to ~100K-doc collections, used across AmLaw 100 firms.

  • Adopted by most AmLaw 100 firms
  • Bulk doc analysis via Vault
  • Grounds answers in firm's own materials
  • Operates across 60 countries
  • No public pricing, sales-only
  • ~$1,000+/lawyer/mo, 20-seat minimum
  • Tuned to big-firm billable workflows
  • Heavy enterprise onboarding