Figure AI vs Physical Intelligence
A side-by-side comparison of Figure AI and Physical Intelligence, two Robotics tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Figure AI
RoboticsHumanoid robots powered by Helix, an in-house vision-language-action model.
View Figure AIPhysical Intelligence
RoboticsGeneral-purpose foundation models that aim to control any robot to do any task.
View Physical IntelligenceAt a glance
| Attribute | Figure AI | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Robotics | Robotics |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREE |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open source |
| Deployment | Local | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | API | API, Linux |
| Model support | Self-contained (on-device) | Self-contained (on-device) |
| Vendor (differs) | Figure AI | Physical Intelligence |
The honest brief
Figure AI
Exited its OpenAI deal to own the full stack — Helix runs onboard, so hardware and AI are built end-to-end in-house.
- Proprietary Helix VLA model
- Full-stack hardware + AI
- Real pilots (BMW manufacturing)
- Figure 03 targets the home
- Not a buyable product yet
- Capital-intensive, long timelines
- General-purpose autonomy unproven at scale
Physical Intelligence
Open-sourced its flagship robot VLA: π0's code and weights ship in the public openpi repo, rare for a frontier lab.
- openpi repo runs and fine-tunes locally
- Cross-embodiment VLA foundation model
- Built on a pretrained vision-language model
- Demonstrated dexterous real-world tasks
- Research artifact, not a turnkey product
- Needs robot hardware and ML expertise
- Linux/local deployment only