Extend vs Pulse
A side-by-side comparison of Extend and Pulse, two Data Ops tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
The honest brief
Extend
Ensembles multiple frontier models and pairs the API with a web Studio for schema iteration and evals — tuned for 99%+ accuracy on handwriting and tables.
- Handles handwriting, tables, mixed formats
- Studio UI for schema design + evals
- SDKs for Python, TypeScript, and CLI
- Free credits, then pay-as-you-go
- Used by Brex, Square, Checkr
- Newer than incumbent IDP vendors
- Cloud-first; self-host is enterprise-only
- Usage-credit pricing needs estimation
Pulse
Built its own OCR + layout + vision stack (the Ultra model) for messy financial, medical, and legal documents, rather than wrapping a general LLM.
- Purpose-built models for hard layouts
- Handles PDFs, Office files, scans
- Free sandbox to evaluate
- Used by large enterprises
- Cloud-only (no self-host)
- Self-serve pricing not public
- Closed-source models