Edison Scientific vs Undermind
A side-by-side comparison of Edison Scientific and Undermind, two Research tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Edison Scientific
ResearchKosmos, the AI scientist — autonomous literature and data-analysis research runs.
View Edison ScientificUndermind
ResearchAI deep-research agent that finds every relevant paper on a scientific question.
View UndermindAt a glance
The honest brief
Edison Scientific
Kosmos runs multi-hour autonomous campaigns over ~1,500 papers per run — deeper than single-shot literature agents.
- Every finding linked to code or citations
- First six Kosmos runs free for academics
- Lineage in FutureHouse's PaperQA agents
- On-prem deployment for enterprises
- SOC 2 Type II compliant
- $200 per Kosmos run after the free quota
- Synthesized conclusions ~58% accurate in validation
- Focused on biology and chemistry domains
- Runs take hours — built for depth, not speed
Undermind
Runs an iterative, citation-chasing agent for minutes per query to surface the relevant papers keyword search misses — completeness over speed.
- Exhaustive citation-trail search
- Explains each result's relevance
- Built by domain-PhD founders
- Free tier with a few deep searches
- Slow — minutes per query
- Limited deep searches per tier
- Web-only, no API/extraction tables
- Narrow scope vs general assistants