Edison Scientific vs FutureHouse
A side-by-side comparison of Edison Scientific and FutureHouse, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Edison Scientific
ResearchKosmos, the AI scientist — autonomous literature and data-analysis research runs.
View Edison ScientificFutureHouse
ScienceAI agents that automate scientific literature research and discovery.
View FutureHouseAt a glance
| Attribute | Edison Scientific | FutureHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Research | Science |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | FREE |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, API |
| Model support | — | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Edison Scientific | FutureHouse |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Edison Scientific
Kosmos runs multi-hour autonomous campaigns over ~1,500 papers per run — deeper than single-shot literature agents.
- Every finding linked to code or citations
- First six Kosmos runs free for academics
- Lineage in FutureHouse's PaperQA agents
- On-prem deployment for enterprises
- SOC 2 Type II compliant
- $200 per Kosmos run after the free quota
- Synthesized conclusions ~58% accurate in validation
- Focused on biology and chemistry domains
- Runs take hours — built for depth, not speed
FutureHouse
Unlike chat-based research tools, its agents are tuned and benchmarked on scientific literature tasks — PaperQA2 posted superhuman lit-search scores.
- Free to use
- Specialized science agents
- Open API access
- Strong lit-search benchmarks
- Narrow to research workflows
- Accuracy not guaranteed
- Smaller model ecosystem
- Newer platform
When to pick which
FutureHouse leans on Literature search as a headline capability; Edison Scientific treats it as secondary.
- Literature search (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- FREEMIUM · FREE
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.