Dust vs Lindy
A side-by-side comparison of Dust and Lindy, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Dust
AgentEnterprise platform for building and sharing custom AI agents on company knowledge.
View DustAt a glance
| Attribute | Dust | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Agent | Automation |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Dust | Lindy AI |
The honest brief
Dust
Org-wide 'multiplayer' AI over shared company knowledge — agents are built once and reused across teams, not siloed per user.
- Agents shareable across the org
- Broad workspace connector library
- Per-agent choice of frontier models
- MIT-licensed open codebase
- No free tier beyond a 14-day trial
- Per-seat cost scales with org size
Lindy
Agents that wait on an inbox or calendar then act with judgment, rather than Zapier's one-shot triggers.
- Long-running, triggered agents
- Easy no-code setup
- 4,000+ app integrations
- Multi-step actions with judgment
- Credit-based pricing unpredictable
- Limited human support
- Strains on very complex flows