Devin vs Manus
A side-by-side comparison of Devin and Manus, two Agent tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Devin | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent | Agent |
| Pricing (differs) | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Single model (proprietary) | Single model (proprietary) |
| Vendor (differs) | Cognition AI | Meta (formerly Monica / Manus AI) |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Devin
Runs asynchronously in its own cloud sandbox aimed at whole tickets, not autocomplete — plans, codes, and opens a PR.
- Autonomous, async whole-ticket work
- Own sandbox: browser, terminal, editor
- Submits PRs end-to-end
- Good for long-horizon tasks
- Closed model and harness
- Hosted-only, no self-host
- Premium-priced
- Reliability varies on complex tickets
Manus
A general operator that plans and executes multi-step non-code work autonomously, not a single-prompt chatbot.
- Runs tasks autonomously over hours
- Multi-agent orchestration in a Linux sandbox
- Strong GAIA benchmark scores
- Browses, drafts, and schedules for you
- Credits drain fast on complex tasks
- Reliability gaps; tasks fail mid-stream
- No SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA as of 2026
- China data-flow compliance concerns
When to pick which
They share capabilities, but each leads with different ones as a headline job:
Devin is built around Autonomous coding agent.
- Autonomous coding agent (primary capability)
Manus is built around Browser automation.
- Browser automation (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- Pricing
- PAID · FREEMIUM
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.