Daytona vs Runloop
A side-by-side comparison of Daytona and Runloop, two Infra tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Daytona | Runloop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Infra | Infra |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | API, CLI | API, CLI, Web |
| Model support | Model-agnostic | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Daytona | Runloop AI, Inc. |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Daytona
Boots an isolated sandbox with its own kernel and filesystem in under 90ms, so agents run untrusted code safely.
- Sub-100ms sandbox start
- Full isolated kernel + FS
- SDKs in many languages
- Open-source, self-host option
- AGPL-3.0 may deter some
- Infra to manage if self-hosted
- Newer entrant
Runloop
Pairs on-demand coding-agent Devboxes with a public benchmarking suite, so you can both run agents and measure them on one platform.
- Isolated cloud sandboxes for agent code
- Scales to thousands of parallel Devboxes
- Full filesystem, build-tool, compiler access
- $50 in free starter credits
- Enterprise VPC + compliance options
- Usage-based pricing can be hard to forecast
- Aimed at developers, not end users
- Proprietary, no self-host option
When to pick which
Both cover Sandboxed code execution.
Pick Daytona if you need Browser automation.
- Browser automation (secondary capability)
Pick Runloop if you need LLM evaluation.
- LLM evaluation (primary capability)
They also differ on:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud
- Platforms
- API, CLI · API, CLI, Web