Skip to content

Cursor vs Windsurf

A side-by-side comparison of Cursor and Windsurf, two IDE tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Cursor

IDE

AI-first code editor. Multi-model, tab-completion native.

View Cursor

Windsurf

IDE

Agent-first IDE with the Cascade planning agent.

View Windsurf

At a glance

Feature comparison of Cursor and Windsurf
AttributeCursorWindsurf
CategoryIDEIDE
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
DeploymentLocalLocal
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxmacOS, Windows, Linux
Model supportMulti-modelMulti-model
Vendor (differs)AnysphereCognition

The honest brief

Cursor

Pioneered agentic, multi-file editing in a familiar VS Code fork — frontier models bundled, no API key wrangling.

  • Inherits the VS Code extension ecosystem
  • Frontier models bundled in one plan
  • Strong multi-file agent + tab completion
  • BYO key supported
  • Closed source (the editor itself)
  • Heavier on usage limits at higher tiers
  • No first-party Linux/mobile parity gaps

Windsurf

Cascade plans before it edits, paying off on multi-file changes — with a cleaner, less busy UX than rivals.

  • Cascade agent plans then acts
  • Strong multi-file change handling
  • Good terminal integration
  • Bundled model spend in subscription
  • Closed source
  • Ownership upheaval (acquisition saga)
  • Usage limits on lower tiers
  • Smaller extension base than VS Code