Crush vs OpenCode
A side-by-side comparison of Crush and OpenCode, two IDE tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
OpenCode
IDEThe open-source, provider-agnostic AI coding agent for your terminal, IDE, or desktop.
View OpenCodeAt a glance
| Attribute | Crush | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | IDE | IDE |
| Pricing (differs) | BYO KEY | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment | Local | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | CLI, macOS, Linux, Windows | CLI, macOS, Windows, Linux, VS Code extension |
| Model support (differs) | BYO key / model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Charm | Anomaly |
The honest brief
Crush
Charm's signature TUI polish over a model-agnostic terminal agent: switch providers mid-session and keep code, keys, and data on your own machine.
- Polished, keyboard-driven terminal UI
- BYO keys for many providers
- LSP-aware code context
- Runs locally; you control keys and data
- Requires your own model API keys
- Beta — some features still missing
- FSL license is not OSI open-source yet
OpenCode
Fully open-source and provider-agnostic where most agent CLIs are vendor-locked — swap among 75+ providers, including local models.
- Fully open source
- Swap among many providers and local models
- Terminal, desktop, and IDE surfaces
- No code stored on external servers
- Quality varies with chosen model
- Fast-moving, frequent releases
- Zen's curated models cost extra