Crowdin vs Lingo.dev
A side-by-side comparison of Crowdin and Lingo.dev, two Translation tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Lingo.dev
TranslationOpen-source AI localization for web and mobile apps, built for developers and CI/CD.
View Lingo.devAt a glance
| Attribute | Crowdin | Lingo.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Translation | Translation |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API, CLI | Web, CLI, API |
| Model support (differs) | BYO key / model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Crowdin | Lingo.dev |
The honest brief
Crowdin
Passes AI translation through at the provider's raw API rate (no markup), and is free for open-source and personal projects.
- 700+ integrations, 100+ file formats
- AI billed at provider rates, no markup
- Free for open-source and personal use
- Git-style branching for strings
- API + CLI for CI localization
- Proprietary, hosted SaaS
- Data residency gated to Enterprise
- Per-string/seat costs add up at scale
Lingo.dev
Runs as an open-source CLI and compiler inside your repo and CI, auto-translating on each commit — not a separate web TMS you paste strings into.
- Native Git and CI/CD workflow
- Per-locale model chains
- Persists glossaries and brand voice
- LLM cost passed through at zero markup
- 14+ file formats supported
- Hosted engine is proprietary, only the tooling is open
- Production plan starts at $99/mo
- Developer-oriented, not for non-technical translators