Continue vs GitHub Copilot
A side-by-side comparison of Continue and GitHub Copilot, two IDE tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
GitHub Copilot
IDEAI pair programmer in your editor — completions, chat, and agents.
View GitHub CopilotAt a glance
| Attribute | Continue | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | IDE | IDE |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Local | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | VS Code extension, CLI, macOS, Windows, Linux | VS Code extension, CLI, Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Continue Dev | GitHub (Microsoft) |
The honest brief
Continue
Runs fully local via Ollama with your own keys, so code never leaves your machine — unlike cloud-bound rivals like Cursor or Copilot.
- Apache-2.0 open source
- VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI
- Any model provider, your own keys
- Chat, autocomplete, and agent modes
- More setup than turnkey tools
- Quality depends on chosen model
- Less polished than Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Deepest IDE + GitHub-native reach — runs in VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, CLI, and ships a cloud agent that opens PRs.
- Works across most major IDEs
- GitHub-native PR/agent workflow
- Model picker spans Anthropic/OpenAI/Google
- Free tier for light use
- Usage-based AI-credit billing can surprise
- Agent quality trails dedicated tools
- Closed source