Conductor vs Kilo Code
A side-by-side comparison of Conductor and Kilo Code, two Agent tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Conductor | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent | Agent |
| Pricing (differs) | FREE | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Local | — |
| Platforms (differs) | macOS | VS Code extension, CLI |
| Model support | BYO key / model | BYO key / model |
| Vendor (differs) | Melty Labs | Kilo Code, Inc. |
The honest brief
Conductor
A native Mac control plane that runs several coding agents at once, each sandboxed in its own git worktree so parallel work never collides.
- Runs many coding agents in parallel
- Each agent isolated in a git worktree
- Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor
- App is free; bring your own agent plan
- Real-time progress + easy merge review
- macOS (Apple Silicon) only
- Not open source
- Useful only with paid agent subscriptions
- Young, fast-changing product
Kilo Code
Routes 500+ models at zero markup on your own keys, so you pay providers directly — unlike agents that mark up or lock you to one model.
- Fully open source (MIT)
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI
- Plans, writes, edits, and runs code
- Specialized modes (Code, Architect, Debug)
- Free tier plus paid cloud and team plans
- You manage model costs and keys
- Cloud and team features are paid
- Agent quality depends on chosen model
- Young project (launched 2025)