Skip to content

Composio vs Smithery

A side-by-side comparison of Composio and Smithery, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Composio

MCP

Authenticated toolkits that give AI agents access to SaaS apps, via MCP or API.

View Composio

Smithery

MCP

Registry and hosting platform for Model Context Protocol servers.

View Smithery

At a glance

Feature comparison of Composio and Smithery
AttributeComposioSmithery
CategoryMCPMCP
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
License (differs)Open coreProprietary
DeploymentCloudCloud
Platforms (differs)APIWeb, CLI, API
Model supportModel-agnosticModel-agnostic
Vendor (differs)ComposioSmithery

The honest brief

Composio

Handles per-integration OAuth so agents get authenticated, production-ready tools instead of raw API stubs to wire up.

  • 1000+ managed toolkits, 20,000+ tools
  • MCP Gateway endpoint per team
  • MCP and direct-API access
  • Free tier covers 20K tool calls/mo
  • Cloud-managed auth means some lock-in
  • Free tier caps tool calls
  • Tool quality varies by integration

Smithery

Largest MCP registry (6,000+ servers) with managed OAuth and hosting, so agents get authenticated tool access without config wrangling.

  • Browse and install community servers
  • CLI installs without editing JSON
  • Persistent authenticated connections
  • Deploy your own servers
  • Only the CLI is open-source (AGPL)
  • Registry/hosting is a closed platform
  • Quality of community servers varies
Composio detailsSmithery detailsAll MCP apps