Composio vs Gram

A side-by-side comparison of Composio and Gram, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of 2026-06-20

Composio

MCP

Authenticated toolkits that give AI agents access to SaaS apps, via MCP or API.

Gram

MCP

Build, curate, and host Model Context Protocol servers from your APIs or TypeScript.

At a glance

Feature comparison of Composio and Gram
Attribute	Composio	Gram
Category	MCP	MCP
Pricing	FREEMIUM	FREEMIUM
License	Open core	Open core
Deployment (differs)	Cloud	Hybrid
Platforms (differs)	API	Web, CLI, API
Model support	Model-agnostic	Model-agnostic
Vendor (differs)	Composio	Speakeasy

The honest brief

Composio

Handles per-integration OAuth so agents get authenticated, production-ready tools instead of raw API stubs to wire up.

1000+ managed toolkits, 20,000+ tools
MCP Gateway endpoint per team
MCP and direct-API access
Free tier covers 20K tool calls/mo

Cloud-managed auth means some lock-in
Free tier caps tool calls
Tool quality varies by integration

Gram

Curates and composes business-level tools from your OpenAPI or TypeScript instead of exposing raw API endpoints, so agents get cleaner toolsets.

Open source (AGPL-3.0)
Hosted MCP servers, no infra
OpenAPI and TypeScript sources
Built-in OAuth 2.1 proxy
Tool curation, not raw APIs

Still in public beta
Usage-based costs at scale
Tied to Speakeasy ecosystem
Newer, smaller community

Composio details Gram details All MCP apps