Composio vs Glama

A side-by-side comparison of Composio and Glama, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of 2026-06-08

Composio

MCP

Authenticated toolkits that give AI agents access to SaaS apps, via MCP or API.

Glama

MCP

MCP server registry, inspector, and gateway.

At a glance

Feature comparison of Composio and Glama
Attribute	Composio	Glama
Category	MCP	MCP
Pricing	FREEMIUM	FREEMIUM
License (differs)	Open core	Proprietary
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms (differs)	API	Web, API
Model support	Model-agnostic	Model-agnostic
Vendor (differs)	Composio	Glama

The honest brief

Composio

Handles per-integration OAuth so agents get authenticated, production-ready tools instead of raw API stubs to wire up.

1000+ managed toolkits, 20,000+ tools
MCP Gateway endpoint per team
MCP and direct-API access
Free tier covers 20K tool calls/mo

Cloud-managed auth means some lock-in
Free tier caps tool calls
Tool quality varies by integration

Glama

Superset of the official MCP registry that scores servers and lets you test any of them in an ephemeral browser sandbox.

Indexes 10000+ MCP servers, security-scored
In-browser Inspector for live tool calls
Gateway adds auth, logs, access control
Hosting for private/public servers

Hosting and Gateway features are paid
Quality varies across indexed servers
Cloud-centric, not a local tool

Composio details Glama details All MCP apps