Skip to content

Cognee vs Graphlit

A side-by-side comparison of Cognee and Graphlit, two Memory tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Cognee

Memory

Open-source memory for AI agents.

View Cognee

Graphlit

Memory

One API for AI agent memory: ingest, extract, store, retrieve.

View Graphlit

At a glance

Feature comparison of Cognee and Graphlit
AttributeCogneeGraphlit
CategoryMemoryMemory
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
License (differs)Open coreProprietary
Deployment (differs)HybridCloud
Platforms (differs)APIAPI, Web
Model support (differs)BYO key / modelMulti-model
Vendor (differs)CogneeGraphlit

The honest brief

Cognee

Builds an LLM-derived knowledge graph alongside embeddings, so recall follows relationships, not just vector similarity.

  • Self-hostable Python SDK
  • Recall follows concept relationships
  • Bring your own LLM/embedding provider
  • Newer, smaller ecosystem
  • Cognify pipeline adds LLM cost
  • Self-host setup overhead

Graphlit

Graph-native context layer that links ingested content into an entity graph plus stateful memory, not just vector chunks.

  • One API for ingest, extract, store, retrieve
  • Multimodal (docs, audio, video, images)
  • Graph-based entity linking + hybrid search
  • Event-driven webhooks for reactive agents
  • More infra/overhead than plain RAG
  • Overkill for simple doc Q&A
  • Cloud-only managed service
  • Graph/timeline modeling adds complexity