CoCounsel vs Luminance
A side-by-side comparison of CoCounsel and Luminance, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | CoCounsel | Luminance |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Pricing | PAID | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Thomson Reuters | Luminance |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
CoCounsel
Grounds answers in licensed Westlaw and Practical Law content, so cites are verifiable rather than open-web guesses.
- Research, contract analysis, and drafting
- Integrates into Microsoft 365 workflows
- Prompts not used to train models
- Expensive enterprise pricing
- Not a standalone product
- US-centric legal coverage
Luminance
Autopilot redlining against your playbook across 14+ languages — built for high-volume inbound review, not drafting.
- Fast autopilot redlining
- Cross-border, multilingual review
- Pattern-detection risk heatmaps
- Purpose-built legal models
- Built for transactional, not litigation
- Weaker at net-new drafting
- Enterprise sales and deployment
- Opaque per-seat pricing
When to pick which
They share capabilities, but each leads with different ones as a headline job:
CoCounsel is built around Contract drafting.
- Contract drafting (primary capability)
Luminance is built around Contract review.
- Contract review (primary capability)
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.