Skip to content

CoCounsel vs Harvey

A side-by-side comparison of CoCounsel and Harvey, two Legal tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

CoCounsel

Legal

AI legal assistant grounded in Thomson Reuters content.

View CoCounsel

Harvey

Legal

Domain-specific AI for legal and professional services.

View Harvey

At a glance

Feature comparison of CoCounsel and Harvey
AttributeCoCounselHarvey
CategoryLegalLegal
PricingPAIDPAID
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
DeploymentCloudCloud
PlatformsWebWeb
Model supportMulti-modelMulti-model
Vendor (differs)Thomson ReutersHarvey AI

The honest brief

CoCounsel

Grounds answers in licensed Westlaw and Practical Law content, so cites are verifiable rather than open-web guesses.

  • Research, contract analysis, and drafting
  • Integrates into Microsoft 365 workflows
  • Prompts not used to train models
  • Expensive enterprise pricing
  • Not a standalone product
  • US-centric legal coverage

Harvey

The default general-purpose legal AI at scale: Vault analyzes up to ~100K-doc collections, used across AmLaw 100 firms.

  • Adopted by most AmLaw 100 firms
  • Bulk doc analysis via Vault
  • Grounds answers in firm's own materials
  • Operates across 60 countries
  • No public pricing, sales-only
  • ~$1,000+/lawyer/mo, 20-seat minimum
  • Tuned to big-firm billable workflows
  • Heavy enterprise onboarding