Cartesia vs LiveKit
A side-by-side comparison of Cartesia and LiveKit, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
LiveKit
InfraOpen-source framework and cloud for realtime voice, video, and physical AI agents.
View LiveKitAt a glance
| Attribute | Cartesia | LiveKit |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Voice | Infra |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Proprietary | Open core |
| Deployment (differs) | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Platforms (differs) | API | Web, API, CLI |
| Model support (differs) | Single model (proprietary) | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Cartesia | LiveKit, Inc. |
The honest brief
Cartesia
State-space Sonic models hit sub-100ms first audio — the latency floor for real-time voice agent loops.
- Streaming over WebSocket for fast first audio
- State-space architecture, not transformer
- Streaming-first WebSocket protocol depth
- Cost-competitive at scale
- Long-form expressive texture trails ElevenLabs
- Fewer voices than ElevenLabs catalog
- API-only, no end-user app
LiveKit
The open-source realtime layer most voice-agent stacks run on — sub-second STT-LLM-TTS with turn detection, interruptions, and telephony, BYO models.
- Powers ChatGPT Advanced Voice in production
- Self-hostable, with telephony built in
- BYO STT/LLM/TTS — no model lock-in
- Reliable turn detection and interruptions
- Managed cloud option alongside the OSS
- Developer infrastructure, not a no-code product
- You assemble and pay for STT/LLM/TTS separately
- Realtime media ops add operational complexity