Browser Use vs Fellou
A side-by-side comparison of Browser Use and Fellou, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Browser Use | Fellou |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Agent | Assistant |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | FREE |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | CLI, API | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Model support (differs) | BYO key / model | — |
| Vendor (differs) | Browser Use | Fellou AI |
The honest brief
Browser Use
Parses the DOM into a structured view any LLM can drive — leads open browser agents at ~89% on WebVoyager.
- Top open-source WebVoyager score (~89%)
- Model-agnostic, MIT-licensed
- Structured DOM view instead of vision
- Hosted Cloud option for managed sessions
- Success drops on bot-protected sites
- Vulnerable to indirect prompt injection
- Needs dev skills, not plug-and-play
- Multi-step tasks still need human checks
Fellou
Plans a visible, editable action plan and then autonomously executes multi-site tasks — research, forms, reports — instead of just answering questions.
- Autonomous multi-site task execution
- Review and intervene at any step
- Deep research across many tabs
- Cross-platform: macOS, Windows, Linux
- Drag-and-drop local file analysis
- Early-stage, credit-gated beta
- No mobile version
- Agentic browsing raises security questions
- Free 'Spark' credits run out quickly