Baseten vs Cerebrium
A side-by-side comparison of Baseten and Cerebrium, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Cerebrium
InfraServerless GPU infrastructure for real-time AI — voice, video, and LLM workloads.
View CerebriumAt a glance
| Attribute | Baseten | Cerebrium |
|---|---|---|
| Category (differs) | Inference | Infra |
| Pricing (differs) | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web, API | API, CLI |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Baseten | Cerebrium |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Baseten
Pairs prebuilt Model APIs with dedicated Truss deployments and scale-to-zero, so you don't pay for idle GPUs.
- Prebuilt Model APIs for Llama, DeepSeek
- Dedicated GPU/CPU deploys for custom models
- Open-source Truss packaging format
- Production-grade observability and autoscaling
- Dedicated GPU rates run pricier than Modal
- Per-replica cost doubles for redundancy
- Engineering effort to package custom models
Cerebrium
Tuned for real-time voice and video agents, where its fast cold starts and multi-region failover beat general-purpose GPU clouds.
- 2–4s cold starts, scale-to-zero
- 12+ GPU types up to B200
- Multi-region deploys + failover
- SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR compliant
- $100/mo base on the Standard tier
- Hobby tier capped at 3 apps, 5 GPUs
- Younger platform, smaller community
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, Baseten and Cerebrium differ on pricing and platforms:
- Pricing
- FREEMIUM · PAID
- Platforms
- Web, API · API, CLI
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.