Base44 vs Bolt.new
A side-by-side comparison of Base44 and Bolt.new, two Agent tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Bolt.new
AgentPrompt-to-app generator running in the browser. WebContainers under the hood.
View Bolt.newAt a glance
| Attribute | Base44 | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent | Agent |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Wix | StackBlitz |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Base44
Generates the database, auth, and hosting for each app automatically, so non-coders ship working tools end-to-end without wiring a backend.
- Full working apps from plain-English prompts
- Free tier to start, no card required
- Aimed squarely at non-developers
- Credit usage can climb on complex apps
- Less control than hand-coding
- Opinionated, platform-managed stack
Bolt.new
Runs the whole Node stack in-browser via WebContainers, giving a real full-stack IDE no rival sandbox matches.
- Full Node stack runs in the browser tab
- Code-first with a real editable IDE
- Generates frontend, backend, and deps
- Good for modern JS framework projects
- Token usage can burn fast on iteration
- Less hand-holding than design-first builders
- Backend/database wiring weaker than Lovable
When to pick which
Both cover AI app builder and App / agent deployment.
Pick Base44 if you need Trigger-action automation.
- Trigger-action automation (secondary capability)
Pick Bolt.new if you need UI design / design-to-code.
- UI design / design-to-code (primary capability)