Skip to content

Arcade vs Gram

A side-by-side comparison of Arcade and Gram, two MCP tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Arcade

MCP

The MCP runtime for secure, authenticated agent tool-calling.

View Arcade

Gram

MCP

Build, curate, and host Model Context Protocol servers from your APIs or TypeScript.

View Gram

At a glance

Feature comparison of Arcade and Gram
AttributeArcadeGram
CategoryMCPMCP
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
License (differs)ProprietaryOpen core
Deployment (differs)CloudHybrid
Platforms (differs)APIWeb, CLI, API
Model supportModel-agnosticModel-agnostic
Vendor (differs)ArcadeSpeakeasy

The honest brief

Arcade

Auth-first MCP runtime: brokers per-user OAuth so an agent acts as the real end user, not behind one shared token.

  • Real actions in Gmail, GitHub, Slack
  • Prebuilt agent-optimized tools
  • Open framework for custom tools
  • Exposed over MCP standard
  • Closed/hosted core platform
  • Newer entrant in MCP space
  • Setup needed per integration
  • Free tier limited

Gram

Curates and composes business-level tools from your OpenAPI or TypeScript instead of exposing raw API endpoints, so agents get cleaner toolsets.

  • Open source (AGPL-3.0)
  • Hosted MCP servers, no infra
  • OpenAPI and TypeScript sources
  • Built-in OAuth 2.1 proxy
  • Tool curation, not raw APIs
  • Still in public beta
  • Usage-based costs at scale
  • Tied to Speakeasy ecosystem
  • Newer, smaller community