Skip to content

Google Antigravity vs Windsurf

A side-by-side comparison of Google Antigravity and Windsurf, two IDE tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.

Compared from listings verified as of

Google Antigravity

IDE

Agentic development platform built on a VS Code fork.

View Google Antigravity

Windsurf

IDE

Agent-first IDE with the Cascade planning agent.

View Windsurf

At a glance

Feature comparison of Google Antigravity and Windsurf
AttributeGoogle AntigravityWindsurf
CategoryIDEIDE
PricingFREEMIUMFREEMIUM
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
DeploymentLocalLocal
Platforms (differs)macOS, Windows, Linux, CLImacOS, Windows, Linux
Model supportMulti-modelMulti-model
Vendor (differs)GoogleCognition
Capabilities (differs)
  • Autonomous coding agent
  • IDE integration
  • Code generation
  • Multi-agent orchestration
  • Browser automation
  • Autonomous coding agent
  • Code generation
  • IDE integration
  • Code review
  • MCP server

The honest brief

Google Antigravity

Agent-first VS Code fork where agents emit verifiable Artifacts — plans, screenshots, recordings — not just diffs.

  • Manager view orchestrates parallel agents
  • Agents produce verifiable Artifacts
  • Spans editor, terminal, and browser
  • Launched with Gemini 3, free in preview
  • Public preview — early/unstable
  • Closed source
  • Ties best into Google's Gemini models
  • Smaller ecosystem than Cursor

Windsurf

Cascade plans before it edits, paying off on multi-file changes — with a cleaner, less busy UX than rivals.

  • Cascade agent plans then acts
  • Strong multi-file change handling
  • Good terminal integration
  • Bundled model spend in subscription
  • Closed source
  • Ownership upheaval (acquisition saga)
  • Usage limits on lower tiers
  • Smaller extension base than VS Code

When to pick which

Both cover Autonomous coding agent, IDE integration, and Code generation.

Pick Google Antigravity if you need Multi-agent orchestration and Browser automation.

  • Multi-agent orchestration (primary capability)
  • Browser automation (secondary capability)

Pick Windsurf if you need Code review and MCP server.

  • Code review (secondary capability)
  • MCP server (secondary capability)

Windsurf leans on IDE integration and Code generation as a headline capability; Google Antigravity treats them as secondary.

  • IDE integration (primary capability)
  • Code generation (primary capability)

They also differ on:

Platforms
macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI · macOS, Windows, Linux