Google Antigravity vs Cursor
A side-by-side comparison of Google Antigravity and Cursor, two IDE tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
At a glance
| Attribute | Google Antigravity | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | IDE | IDE |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Local | Local |
| Platforms (differs) | macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Anysphere |
The honest brief
Google Antigravity
Agent-first VS Code fork where agents emit verifiable Artifacts — plans, screenshots, recordings — not just diffs.
- Manager view orchestrates parallel agents
- Agents produce verifiable Artifacts
- Spans editor, terminal, and browser
- Launched with Gemini 3, free in preview
- Public preview — early/unstable
- Closed source
- Ties best into Google's Gemini models
- Smaller ecosystem than Cursor
Cursor
Pioneered agentic, multi-file editing in a familiar VS Code fork — frontier models bundled, no API key wrangling.
- Inherits the VS Code extension ecosystem
- Frontier models bundled in one plan
- Strong multi-file agent + tab completion
- BYO key supported
- Closed source (the editor itself)
- Heavier on usage limits at higher tiers
- No first-party Linux/mobile parity gaps