Activepieces vs Make
A side-by-side comparison of Activepieces and Make, two Automation tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Activepieces
AutomationOpen-source, AI-first workflow automation — a self-hostable Zapier alternative.
View ActivepiecesAt a glance
| Attribute | Activepieces | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms (differs) | Web | Web, API |
| Model support (differs) | Multi-model | Model-agnostic |
| Vendor (differs) | Activepieces | Make |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Activepieces
MIT-licensed (true OSI open source, unlike n8n's fair-code) and exposes its 400+ pieces as MCP tools for agents.
- Fully self-hostable
- Native AI steps in the visual builder
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder
- Smaller integration library than Zapier
- Self-hosting adds ops overhead
- Younger ecosystem and community
Make
Visual-canvas builder that handles branching, loops, and conditional routing Zapier's linear steps struggle with.
- Expressive visual flow editor
- 2,500+ native integrations
- Strong branching and routing
- Cheaper per-operation than Zapier
- Steeper curve than Zapier
- Complex scenarios get hard to debug
- Fewer integrations than Zapier
- Cloud-only (no self-host)
When to pick which
Across the signals we compare, Activepieces and Make differ on license, deployment, and platforms:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud
- Platforms
- Web · Web, API
Their capability lists differ in recorded depth — compare the full lists above before deciding.