Activepieces vs Gumloop
A side-by-side comparison of Activepieces and Gumloop, two Automation tools, drawn from Ignaite's continuously-verified listings.
Compared from listings verified as of
Activepieces
AutomationOpen-source, AI-first workflow automation — a self-hostable Zapier alternative.
View ActivepiecesAt a glance
| Attribute | Activepieces | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| License (differs) | Open core | Proprietary |
| Deployment (differs) | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Model support | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Vendor (differs) | Activepieces | Gumloop |
| Capabilities (differs) |
|
|
The honest brief
Activepieces
MIT-licensed (true OSI open source, unlike n8n's fair-code) and exposes its 400+ pieces as MCP tools for agents.
- Fully self-hostable
- Native AI steps in the visual builder
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder
- Smaller integration library than Zapier
- Self-hosting adds ops overhead
- Younger ecosystem and community
Gumloop
AI-native canvas where agents and workflows call each other, plus MCP integrations built from a prompt.
- AI-first node-graph builder
- Agents can call workflows and self-correct
- Build MCP integrations via natural language
- No-code, fast to prototype
- ~100 integrations vs Zapier's thousands
- Ecosystem still maturing
- Less mature error handling than Make
When to pick which
Both cover Workflow orchestration and MCP server.
Pick Activepieces if you need Agent framework and AI app builder.
- Agent framework (secondary capability)
- AI app builder (secondary capability)
Pick Gumloop if you need Multi-agent orchestration and Web scraping.
- Multi-agent orchestration (secondary capability)
- Web scraping (secondary capability)
They also differ on:
- License
- Open core · Proprietary
- Deployment
- Hybrid · Cloud